<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>The International Academy of Tax Law</provider_name><provider_url>https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com</provider_url><author_name>ATL Admin</author_name><author_url>https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com/author/admin/</author_url><title>Denmark vs EAC - The International Academy of Tax Law</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="ktQPHiwlMh"&gt;&lt;a href="https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com/document/denmark-vs-eac/"&gt;Denmark vs EAC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com/document/denmark-vs-eac/embed/#?secret=ktQPHiwlMh" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Denmark vs EAC&#x201D; &#x2014; The International Academy of Tax Law" data-secret="ktQPHiwlMh" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://library.academyoftaxlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/EACvsDENMARK.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>704</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>1000</thumbnail_height><description>This case revolves around whether the taxable income of H1 and H2 should be increased under Denmark&#x2019;s Tax Assessment Act, Section 2, by reclassifying payments between related entities as interest or royalties. The case encompasses two separate tax disputes, one involving whether interest should be applied to royalties due between a Danish parent company and its Venezuelan subsidiary and another focusing on classifying extraordinary dividends as royalty payments.</description></oembed>
